Examples

This curation showcases a research paradigm originally published by Bohnemeyer, J., Bowerman, M., & Brown, P. (2001), which seeks to investigate the argument structure of cut and break verbs cross-lingusitically. The curation uses video clips created by Bohnemeyer, J., Bowerman, M., & Brown, P. (2001) as stimuli and two answer fields of the "options" type for elicitation. Bohnemeyer, J., Bowerman, M., & Brown, P. (2001). Cut and break clips. In S. C. Levinson, & N. J. Enfield (Eds.), Manual for the field season 2001 (pp. 90-96). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. Doi:10.17617/2.874626.

This example showcases a classical annotation job, replicating the method used in NegLab B05 (Frankfurt University). Sample sentences containing Negative Polarity Items were extracted from a corpus (BAWE via Sketch Engine) and fed into Curation Tool using the Dataset Mapper. The Curation covers, NPI, licenser and licensing configuration on several levels of analysis. It makes use of both "options" and "free text" answer type and several display options, e.g. "Drop Down" , "Autocomplete" (a drop down menu with autocomplete) and "Buttons". Buschbom, Dirk, Pascal Hohmann, Nicolas Lamoure, Frank Richter & Manfred Sailer. 2026. NPI Bank (DB 20260603_001 v1.0.1, GUI v1.1.0). SFB 1629 Negation in Language and Beyond (NegLaB). https://npibank.neglab.de (accessed 30 October 2026)

This example showcases an experimental set up investigation scope ambiguities in German. Naive informants are exposed to textual stimuli and asked to report which interpretations match the stimuli by choosing from two images. The curation uses the answer type "options" combined with the display type "image". It also uses randomization of items across for every curator, as well as of every answer option.